The Property Hybrid Partnership is a much-publicised scheme being marketed as a tax planning option for individual property landlords which is being referred to as a Property Hybrid Partnership or ‘hybrid business model’.
HMRC have published information regarding a tax avoidance scheme for Landlords that is being promoted.
HMRC’s view is that the Property Hybrid Partnership scheme does not work.
We explain what it, is, how it apparently works, and why you actually may end up paying more.
“HMRC is aware of a scheme being marketed as a tax planning option available to individual property landlords to structure their property business. Sometimes referred to as a hybrid business model, the arrangement claims to:
– Bypass mortgage interest relief restrictions allowing increased deductions for mortgage interest
– Reduce the tax payable on profits generated by the property business
– Reduce Capital Gains Tax payable when properties are sold
– Reduce Inheritance Tax payable on death
HMRC’s view is that this scheme does not work. People who use these arrangements may have to pay more than the tax they tried to avoid as well as paying interest, penalties and high fees for using such schemes.” Credit: gov.uk
‘Property business arrangements involving hybrid partnerships.’
Property Hybrid Partnerships seek to avoid tax by allowing individual or joint property landlords to transfer their properties to a Limited Liability Partnership (LLP) with a corporate member with the LLP then allocating profits to its members on a discretionary basis. The scheme providers claim that the arrangements allow landlords to:
– Avoid Mortgage interest relief restrictions allowing increased deductions for such interest.
– Reduce the tax payable on profits generated by the property business.
– Reduce Capital Gains Tax (CGT) when the properties are sold.
– Reduce Inheritance Tax (IHT) payable in respect of the properties on death.
Property Hybrid Partnership is claimed to work as follows:
– The individual landlords and/or their family members set up a limited company.
– They then also set up an LLP alongside the limited company with the company being a corporate member of the LLP.
– The individual landlords transfer their properties to the LLP.
– The members of the LLP allocate the LLP profits to themselves on a discretionary basis to ensure that:
– The individual members remain basic rate taxpayers.
– Remaining profits are allocated to the corporate member.
– The corporate member claims a deduction for finance costs (such as mortgage interest) relating to the properties.
Landlords are being advised that the arrangements result in less tax being payable as:
– There are no upfront tax costs incurred in contributing the properties to the LLP, and the properties’ base costs are uplifted to market value at the date of transfer for CGT purposes, thereby reducing the CGT due on a future sale of the properties.
– The landlords remain basic rate taxpayers so are not impacted by finance cost restrictions.
– The corporate member claims a full deduction for its share of finance costs as the restrictions do not apply to it.
– The corporate member is subject to Corporation Tax on its net profit share instead of the higher or additional rates of income tax that would apply if the profits had been allocated to the landlords.
– Business Property Relief (BPR) may be claimed in respect of a hybrid structure carrying on a property rental business resulting in full relief from Inheritance Tax on the death of the landlords.
HMRC’s view is that the Property Hybrid Partnership scheme does not work as the following anti-avoidance legislation will apply:
– The Mixed member partnership legislation at s.850C and s.850D ITTOIA 2005 details how excess profits of a corporate member of an LLP are reallocated to individual members.
– The Disposal of income streams through partnerships rules in Chapter 5AA, S809AAZA of the Income Tax Act 2007, which applies to charge the corporate members’ income on the transferor of the income stream i.e. the landlord.
– 59A TCGA 1992 treats any dealing in chargeable assets by an LLP as by the individual members since LLPs are transparent for tax purposes, meaning that members own a fractional share of assets, and this means that the base cost of properties are unchanged following their introduction to an LLP.
In addition, HMRC considers that a property rental business is likely to be within the exclusions from Business Property Relief at s.105(3) IHTA 1984 as it involves the ‘making or holding investments’, and the use of the hybrid business model does not change the availability of the relief here.
Anyone involved in such a scheme is advised to contact HMRC to discuss how they can settle their position or by speaking to the Robinsons team.